Skip navigation

diversitylane_prostitution_for-blog

Advertisements

47 Comments

  1. Thanks for the link Jake (I’ve deleted it along with your comment), but honestly I’d prefer to keep the site clear of obscene imagery. Your thoughts would be much preferred, if you care to share them.

    • Steve T
    • Posted September 14, 2009 at 1:01 pm
    • Permalink

    Oh my, oh dear-!
    The same PC crowd who accuses Rush of being a “racist”, is going to go ape (oops, cannot use that-!), I mean, will go bananas (darn-! – another insensitive metaphor-!) over this clear comparison of our beloved Community Agitator-in-Chief, and those images of swanky black ‘dudes’ with lots of gold chains, and hookers in their employ.

    Zack – you need to go to ‘sensitivity training’-!

    • R Lemons
    • Posted September 14, 2009 at 2:23 pm
    • Permalink

    AWESOME!!

    • Melek
    • Posted September 14, 2009 at 2:43 pm
    • Permalink

    LOL Zack!

    If I remember correctly … I would describe this as a Symbiotic relationship. In this instance, it’s mutualism … Both benefit!! … while I would describe their mutual relationship to us as parasitic … jointly “screwing” us (harming), the taxpayers! ūüėČ

    I wish you well ūüôā Melek

    “The citizen can bring our political and governmental institutions back to life, make them responsive and accountable, and keep them honest. No one else can.”~ John Gardner

    • ikabod
    • Posted September 14, 2009 at 3:34 pm
    • Permalink

    Racist accusations In 1….. 2…… 3…….

    • ikabod
    • Posted September 14, 2009 at 3:45 pm
    • Permalink

    Yet it was only a isolated case. Move on… nothing to see here.

    Oops:

    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/pimp_hooker_catch_staff_Js4YPEcsCcxLZhAEehLhmL

    • Jay B.
    • Posted September 14, 2009 at 4:03 pm
    • Permalink

    A whole new meaning to POTUS… Pimp Of The United States.

  2. Steve T.: You’re so right. Liberals who pride themselves on being oh so cool, modern and progressive become as prissy and priggish as a Victorian grandmother at High Tea when it comes to the issue of African-Americans and the [nonexistent] “slights” against them that libs are constantly imagining and imputing to anyone who disagrees with them ideologically. Though this cartoon has zero to do with race in any way and everything to do with ACORN’s corruption and Obama’s cheerleading of ACORN, so disappointingly shallow are most libs that they will choose to transmogrify the issue addressed here into one of skin-color (as usual). They are as obsessed with the subject as any Jim Crow redneck in 1930s Alabama.

    • Steve T
    • Posted September 14, 2009 at 4:38 pm
    • Permalink

    ikabod-
    “…only an isolated case.” (?)

    You seem to have missed out on the coverage in the news (not in the MSM) about an extended pattern of criminal behavior from numerous ACORN branches, going back over a number of years (lots of election fraud).

    Would you like some links – and read about it -?

    McCain was too ” civil ” to have the backbone to bring forward ACORNs criminal history and their strong links to Obama, in his Presidential campaign.

  3. Thanks R. Lemons, you appear here bearing not sour but sweet and welcome fruit.

    Nice analysis, Melek. And yes, this does seem to be a trend: Obama and the many hydra-heads of the Left benefitting from corrupt and/or Marxist developments while the nation at large sinks ever deeper in its financial morass and ever closer to anti-individuality.

    Good one, Jay B.– the new meaning of POTUS. You may have permanently defined that acronym for me, for the next three years anyway.

    Ikabod: I too am awaiting the barrage of accusations, but I’m wondering if they’re too shell-shocked. Actually one of them did respond right after I mailed the new one out (name will respectfully be left out here), and did indeed appear to have completely flipped out: kept commenting here by posting a link to an obscene photo– again… and again… and again. After an initial warning I was forced to kick him off my property. He may be drinking heavily even as I write.

  4. Well, according to Chris E. in the last conversation, ACORN is not a corrupt organization, no more so than say Wal-Mart might be.

    I’m sure Chris E. will expand on that again here shortly since this cartoon is certainly the platform for it.

    • Methodistmin
    • Posted September 14, 2009 at 5:14 pm
    • Permalink

    Jay B. The POTUS line was brilliant. Now I won’t be able to get it out of my mind either.

  5. Out of the mouths of babes

    • 1MadJack
    • Posted September 14, 2009 at 7:27 pm
    • Permalink

    Zack one of the best you’ve ever done! ACORN living on our dollar will hopefully and soon come to an end. But what will poor, poor Barry do?

  6. Could you see the look on Devon’s face if she heard that conversation?

  7. Vegas: “Well, according to Chris E. in the last conversation, ACORN is not a corrupt organization, no more so than say Wal-Mart might be.”

    Yeah: Wal-mart… ACORN. Sure, they’re similar. (?!?!) Sometimes I think the libs say these things just to cause us to waste our time trying to argue them out of it. I know of no underage prostitution rings being formulated in Wal-Mart; what department would that take place in?

    Thanks 1Madjack. It would be an incredible triumph for the GOP, morality and sanity were ACORN to be shaken from the gubmint tree… let’s pray some magic like out of a Disney movie takes hold of the House and causes them to echo the scornful Senate renouncement of these scumbags.

    Vegas: I would have said Devon would have a cow hearing this conversation, but I know she doesn’t go in much for maternal imagery. I think having a Vodka on the rocks might be more on the mark.

    Chuck: I actually felt trepidation about drawing this up, with these kids discussing these kinds of things; but afterall these are not kids, they’re drawings of kids. Were I a TV director on the other hand I would balk at putting words like these in the mouths of [real-life] babes.

    Methodistmin: Yep– I think we’re all stuck with Jay B.’s new POTUS spin. “If the shoe fits…”

  8. Just one Zach? Would that be before or after her stroke?

  9. I wouldn’t want to deny anyone the effervescent fun of calling our N.I.C. a pimp and etc. etc. etc. etc.

    You do realize the ‘pimp’ and ‘hos’ they were talking to were white conservative Sasha Baron Cohen wannabes, right?

    • Donna C
    • Posted September 14, 2009 at 9:52 pm
    • Permalink

    “I know of no underage prostitution rings being formulated in Wal-Mart; what department would that take place in?” -Zack

    Get with it Zack…it would be one of a few places: the garden center…that IS where the “hoes” are kept; or the condiments aisle…isn’t that where “honey” is sold? However, I am guessing more than likely it would be the clearance aisle…that’s where you can get “cheap junk at bargain prices”.

    I could be wrong though. =oP

  10. Good point, Vegas: I’m not at all sure she’d make it to the vodka.

    What a pity it would be if during her sudden collapse she were to knock that Obama portrait off the wall and puncture it on the corner of the laptop…

  11. Well, I don’t know, Chris E; maybe these journalists were as you amusingly call them “Sasha Baron Cohen wannabes,” but if it helps expose a monstrously depraved organization as wont to happily dole out advice on effectively keeping children as prostitutes, then here’s to more Sasha Baron Cohen wannabes.

    Donna C: Good leads there for the Wal-mart bordello. Boringly, I had been imagining the Bedding Dept.

  12. Walmart would never sully their stores with guys dressed up in pimp costumes talking about child prostitution, though they will sell the pimp and ho costumes at Halloween I imagine.

    No, they farm that out to Saipan, where actual forced prostitution and abortion occurs, though I suppose those are mostly people who are of legal age. The only child abuse they condone is in factories over in Asia.

    But wait, you’ll say, Walmart insists that once evidence of child labor in their factories exists, they stop working with those factories. You might even say that they “fire” the factories engaging in such behavior. But you know and I know that firing your bad actors does not excuse an organization of their crimes, right?

    • ikabod
    • Posted September 14, 2009 at 11:31 pm
    • Permalink

    Chris, what if this where staffers from 60 minutes? Oh then I imagine it would be a hard hitting look into the sordid underbelly of ACORN? A undercover investigation from CBS’ 48 hours….. No, we have to kids who are doing the job that the nbc/cbs/abc should have been doing. Which then makes it null and void? Come on! ACORN was caught. This is part of the overall business model of the organization.

  13. Captured perfectly. Great cartoon.

    Pimp of the United States–your’e on it Jay B.

    I still find it amazing how casually B.O. and the White House staff lie about their associations and intentions.

    • wootabega
    • Posted September 15, 2009 at 9:32 am
    • Permalink

    ACORN’s pimp is obviously Joe Biden. I mean, just look at him. Dude is a smooth motherfuckin criminal.

  14. Mockazine: thanks, and really like your blog! Some very funny stuff there as well as the MOST hideous photo of the First Lady ever. Perhaps of ANY First Lady.

    wootabega: Very funny; we all know you’re in the bag for this administration, woot. Though it is amusing to think of Biden as “smooth”– he is one of the most awkward and unclassy politicians in our history. No… for smooth you need go no further than Slick Barry.

  15. Obama’s the pimp, ACORN’s the ho, and taxpayers are getting screwed.

    Wootabega: I may have to photoshop a big furry hat and some bling on Biden . . . Can’t dress up B.O., it would be racist and stereotypical.

    Zack, found the picture of flowery FLOTUS accidentally. Could not help but re-post.

  16. Chris E. – Nice try to deflect the argument once again.

    I would add something useful to the discussion here, but I can’t stop laughing at the pic of James O’Keefe’s in his Huggy Bear costume.

  17. Chris E., back to your weak Wal Mart arguement. In how many states is Wally World under investigation right now? How many indictments have been handed down against Wally World in the last year or so?

    Now how about ACORN?

    Apples and Acorns pal… Apples and Acorns

  18. I wasn’t the person to bring up Walmart.

    Go ahead and celebrate the right’s utter smear job of ACORN. Now this means fewer poor people will be able to afford housing or otherwise improve their lives. I imagine this is a Red Letter Day for everyone. Now go back to defending the CIA from absolutely everything because you’re all frightened children.

  19. In the wake of the tragic dismantling of ACORN, hundreds, no thousands of hard working hoes will be left to walk the streets looking for work.

    Oh, wait, they do that anyway. . .

  20. Chris E.– Was it the “right’s smear job” that impelled the Senate today to vote –83 to 7– to stop funding to ACORN? Wow, all those Dems sure are easily swayed! Even arch-leftist Al Franken voted against ACORN. What little integrity you must impute to your own Party to believe they were moved to vote so overwhelmingly against ACORN solely on the basis of a “right wing smear.”

  21. My wife wonders, “what if all the pimps, hoes, and crackheads got real jobs instead of looking for welfare handouts?”

  22. But but but– if they’re defunding ACORN, how can they also be in bed with ACORN? How will you be able to link the non-existent pimps and hypothetical child prostitutes to that N.I.C. pimp Messiahitler Obama now?

    I also like that when [someone you like] is under investigation it’s frivolous nonsense that is being blown out of proportion by politicians with an agenda and a socio-commie-marxist-gay-feminist media.

    But man oh man, if something serves as confirmation bias for your persecution complex, IT MUST BE TRUE.

    Mockazine: your wife is a spiteful bigot and her question has nothing to do with the topic at hand, please let her know.

    • ikabod
    • Posted September 15, 2009 at 8:15 pm
    • Permalink

    Chris E-
    You just cannot let go of your precious ACORN can you? Please defend them all you want, it only makes your postings here more laughable. Investigations now will begin. The Dems in congress where pretty shrewd to hop on board the ACORN investigation bandwagon. Lest their constituents get word of their congressmen having connections with the group. Watch now as Obama begins his distancing from the group. The news media starts to find “No plausible link” between ACORN and his Presidential campaign. Damn Chris E, where’s George Soros to make this all go away?

  23. Chris, you are a strikingly pleasant person. I don’t know how anyone can read you and not be persuaded. Have you considered a job in the Senate?

    My wife works in the inner city and, while she may be cynical or jaded, she is not a bigot. She sees healthy grown men sucking off the teat of society all the time. Unlike you, she no longer wears rose colored glasses.

    I think your Wal-mart comments were further off topic than her opinion of welfare recipients.

  24. ikabod: Yes, my precious ACORN. I love it so. I am a huge fan of ACORN. That is exactly what I have been saying. Thank you for once against showing you’re a child. Not comparing something to Hitler = WHY DON’T YOU MARRY IT?

    Mockazine: Awesome, rose colored glasses. I suggest your wife take off her bootstrap rose colored glasses that write all all the working poor off as crackheads, pimps, hoes and teat-sucking vermin that are to be condescended to. I mean, those are pretty awesome glasses because they allow you to be convinced that the only injustice in the world is THAT MSNBC ISN’T DEMANDING OBAMA SHOW HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND THEN CRY IN SHAME AS HE RESIGNS.

  25. Chris: Dude, time for you to take another hit of your “prescribed” marijuana. You really need to mellow out.

    Truth is, some of the poor don’t work hard and they do live off of drugs, crime, and teat-sucking. You, sir, are guilty of overgeneralizing. Freudian slip?

  26. Chris E., that was laughable, seriously. Can’t you do any better that blame someone else for ACORN?

    Let me guess, you still blame Bush for the fall of Adam and Eve don’t you?

    • Steve T
    • Posted September 15, 2009 at 10:30 pm
    • Permalink

    Hey-! Chris E

    What are you fundamental values, your basic political / moral foundation, the basics of your core beliefs-?

    I am asking, just to understand where you are ‘coming from’.

  27. vegas: I am blaming the people who did wrong at ACORN for the people who did wrong at ACORN. Last I checked, it’s other people on this site that are blaming Obama and anyone they choose to associate with ACORN for everything.

    Hi Steve T!

    I am not sure what you don’t ‘get’. My core values are that people should treat each other decently. What would you like to know in specific?

  28. On the Money! Great job Zack!!

  29. Chris E – You may have missed it on the other post (CIA post) so I will ask again. Did you read the report I linked to on ACORN? It gives a broader case against the organization.

    And to answer your question on how these congressmen can be in on it when they voted against funding. Their vote was mainly due to the immediate controversy. Its called politics. The House, which had already voted, included funding to the organization so I imagine the money will get to them through the reconciliation process. These Dems know that. Then again, maybe some of them have just finally woke up to the reality of the organization.

    Your statement “Now this means fewer poor people will be able to afford housing or otherwise improve their lives” truly shows your lack of understanding of the housing crisis and ACORN itself. Is relaxing loan standards so these people can initially buy a house that they later will not be able to afford really helping them? These lax standards pushed by ACORN and other liberals (including republicans) was a major contributor to the crisis. This line of thinking started with Carter and has continued with every administration since. We are now paying for it. Bending rules as ACORN advocates does not help someone with financial difficulties. They ignore the real problem…education. Because of this lack of foresight or whatever you want to call it, ACORN actually hurts the people it proclaims to help. It is a common problem you see with Alinksy-aligned organizations.

    Also, I am curious why you have stopped responding to me?

  30. If this were an isolated incident or two I’d be with you Chris E., but it’s not. It’s spread across over a dozen states with just about the same MO every time. I’d even be willing to say that up to six incidents could be written off but they passed that number in 2nd gear while accelerating.

    • Cylar
    • Posted September 29, 2009 at 4:05 am
    • Permalink

    How many indictments have been handed down against Wally World in the last year or so?

    I think they did get nailed awhile back for hiring illegals.

    • Manuel Calavera
    • Posted September 29, 2009 at 8:54 pm
    • Permalink

    This may be late, but hopefully you guys will see this.

    http://crooksandliars.com/node/31586/print

    “The ACORN videos are actually just the latest of several films O’Keefe has produced and uploaded to YouTube. An earlier film posted in February, “Taxpayers Clearing House” featured nonwhite, working class people being duped by O’Keefe, who led them to believe they had won money in a sweepstakes.

    In it, O’Keefe and others drive around in a van with a logo on the side that looks like the “Publishers Clearing House” vehicle known for showing up and surprising sweepstakes winners with oversized checks. In O’Keefe’s video, working class Blacks are shown jumping up and down in excitement – until they learn that O’Keefe is actually delivering a bill for $28,000, their share of the federal banks bailout.

    this was funded by about $30k from “Peter Thiel, one of the founders of PayPal and an early investor in Facebook — an investment which made him a billionaire”


One Trackback/Pingback

  1. […] “Wow, I see what you mean!¬† But if ACORN itself is like a ‘prostitute,’ perfomring shady services for a ‘client,’ — the current amoral administration — in exchange for taxpayer money… who would ACORN’s pimp be?” Image courtesy of Zack Rawsthorne via https://diversitylane.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/aporn/. […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: