Skip navigation

diversitylane_notre-dame_for-blog

Advertisements

23 Comments

  1. It would be CRUEL to waterboard said babies.

    Heed teh hairfez!

  2. Ouch. Ouch! That’s awesome, Zack.

    Congrats on the Townhall review!

    • Norman Hines
    • Posted May 19, 2009 at 11:45 am
    • Permalink

    What part of “no person shall be deprived of life without due process of law” don’t they understand?

    And if a fetus isn’t a legal person, at what point in time and under what conditions does a fetus become a legal person, after which depriving her of life requires due process?

    Just asking.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 19, 2009 at 12:01 pm
    • Permalink

    There’s your mistake, Norman. Presuming that any person…in the womb, or after birth, has any right to due process in regards to depriving life.

    The 0bamites, and liberals in general, are a culture of death.

    In the womb? Abortion is okay.
    In the process of being born? Abortion is okay. (PBA)

    Living life in a state not deemed to be “quality”? Euthanize.

    Are you a Terri Schaivo? No big deal…starve them to death.

    See…it doesn’t matter as far as the left is concerned…from pre-birth to old age, if they determine your life is better off not lived…lights out.

    • Norman Hines
    • Posted May 19, 2009 at 1:36 pm
    • Permalink

    Then, Donna, the only place where one need not fear being killed is Death Row.

    • Melek
    • Posted May 19, 2009 at 2:16 pm
    • Permalink

    Great points!

    It’s quite interesting that in their arbitrary and ongoing “redefinition” of terms … to justify the Libs have not come up with a “new” term for the unborn that would eliminate any remote association with human life.

    It’s a pity that they are not confronted with the “If abortion is not killing a human life, what are you killing then?”

    There are 3 forms of life … human, animal and plant … in denying that an unborn child is human, they indeed prove without doubt that it’s indeed human … the lack of clarity in this instance, is in line with their warped sense of logic and relative morality … if not human, according to their environmental dogma, the Libs would be forced to protect an unborn being, because by default it would then be an “animal or a plant life” … which these days justify protection even at the expense of humans.

    As Norman pointed out … they are mainly motivated to protect human life, when the same is perceived to be a “victim” of of an “unfair” system … with the axiom that the USA & anything we do is evil … At which point the true “criminal” becomes the “victim”!

    Notice the typical built-in Liberal justification of their every action by Allison words to Devon … “Deserve” and “It’s not like” …

    Zack, again … outstanding!

    I wish you well 🙂 Melek

    “Many people are concerned with children of India, with the children of Africa where quite a few die of hunger, and so on. Many people are also concerned about the violence in this great country of the United States. These concerns are very good. But often these same people are not concerned with the millions being killed by the deliberate decision of their own mothers. And this is the greatest destroyer of peace today – abortion which brings people to such blindness.”~ Mother Teresa

  3. 420 abort babies every day

  4. Yes, let the babies stick around until they leave the mama. Every sperm is sacred ;_;

    What? You mean their parents can’t afford to care for them! Welfare queens should keep their legs closed!

    Maybe the little ones should pull themselves up by the straps of their booties.

  5. Up yours, you sexist rapist.

    • Donna C.
    • Posted May 19, 2009 at 10:10 pm
    • Permalink

    Don’t let him get to you David…he’s merely posting in a provocative manner to try and garner attention. Read his posts from today, and you can see his whining about not receiving the attention he felt was due him. Typical lib. Nothing new to see with him.

  6. But he got his peanut butter in my chocolate!

  7. It’s Insane Zack!!! This is not a religious issue either! Obama and the Liberal movement have crossed the line with this one. Actually, everyone has crossed the line here! It’s totally INSANE! Does anybody know what the word “Life” means anymore??

    Meanwhile Bush (In 2008):
    This never surfaces though, where’s Obama????: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/07/bush-triples-fu/

  8. Dave: That’s no hair-fez, that’s WINDSWEPT.

    Thanks Eric, and I agree it’s a painful drawing and I got zero joy out of drawing it. I’m not a purist about abortion and I see gray areas when it comes to the very early first stages of life, but soon enough we are talking about an obvious human being and as far as the last few months go, only an idiot or a Progressive can fail to see that we’re dealing with a thoroughly developed child here. Anything that can wiggle its fingers or smile (as children in the womb can do at this stage) is not disposable garbage– unless you’re on the Left. This issue more than any other defines the shocking depravity of Leftist “thought.” Truly, they are today’s version of those very slavers and slavemasters of the antebellum South whose memory they so despise: arrogant and cruel beyond measure as they deign which humans are fit to live free, and which are worthless property to be beaten or (in the present case) killed.

  9. Norman, Donna: I loved that three-part exchange– it was so smart and pithy it could be lifted and utilized verbatim as lines in a well crafted drama on the subject of liberal misanthropy. Thanks for spending time here, its an honor to have sharp folks like you at my blog.

    And Melek, that too was a brilliant analysis. Theirs (the Left’s) is a respect for Leftism, not life, as you so clearly outline. They will march all night holding cheap candles to try to spare the life of a death-row inmate who butchered a family, but an innocent 8-month old child in the womb, to their way of thinking, is of no more objective value than a decayed tooth if the mother So Decrees It.

  10. Kool-Aid: EVEN YOU are capable of better than this. And by the way welfare queens certainly should keep their legs closed; or open just enough to stride to town where they can apply for a job. Anything outrageous in that suggestion, to you?

    Dave: If you can’t take the heat, stay away from the chocolate. AND the peanut butter.

    Jose: I agree, it’s not a religious issue, simply a matter of preserving, versus destroying, life. So thorough a brainwash has the Left managed on our culture that the side favoring saving incipient children (developmentally well-progressed and viable as human beings) is painted as “fanatical extremists” while the side favoring death to a fully formed child just days away from birth is construed as “fair.” A truly depraved and horrific situation.

    • Norman Hines
    • Posted May 20, 2009 at 8:06 am
    • Permalink

    Progressivism may be self-limiting; the aborted will not grow up to vote Progressive.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 20, 2009 at 8:32 am
    • Permalink

    Exactly Norman! I have stated for years, that with the left’s penchant for abortion and “one child” family ideals…it won’t be long before they force themselves into extinction.

    Such a shame. No. Really. I mean that. With all my heart. Almost.

    • Norman Hines
    • Posted May 20, 2009 at 9:57 am
    • Permalink

    It has already happened in Europe. The Left will be replaced by monomaniacal (Muslim) theocrates that would make Oliver Cromwell look like a pussycat.

  11. If it’s not a baby why do they call them prenatal doctors?
    They can tell the gender earlier and earlier these days…….so it must be a female REFRIGERATOR? hmmm

  12. Actually Z, that is just a collection of cells that can be disposed of as desired.

    If Roe V. Wade had been around in 1966 I would not be typing this right now. Needless to say I am strongly pro life.

    Zack you need to read this article about what happens during the early pregnancy.
    http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2009/05/miracle-of-life-action-packed-days-of.html

    Sorry no haiku this time, too angry.

  13. Getting back to my usual detail analysis Zack. Excellent work! In this illustration I see “Action” the students in the background moving about and raising the signs, great detail. The word “Ripp”, oh, this is what I mean about going to another level. I actually can imagine in my head and hear, how violently the sign is being ripped! Not to mention there are others laying there. Allison must make a choice now?? And “Fatal Position” It tells it all!! Great job Zack, again!

  14. Norman: Great point, as Donna says. Though we’ll continue to see hordes of new young Leftists as long as Leftists predominate in our college and university professoriates. Anyone for aborting tenure?

    Donna I REALLY FEEL your sincerity in that last regret.

    And right again Norman in pointing out the dwindling population of non-Muslim Europeans. See Paris Now– if you wait five or ten years it won’t be worth visiting.

  15. Excellent point, Z. If it can be identified as either male or female (unlike, say, numerous colorful adults in our population), then a male or female WHAT?

    Vegas, I greatly appreciated that article and believe me I am giving more and more thought to the issue.

    Thanks Jose, your critique is as always well-informed and thoughtful. Glad the sound effect didn’t jar– it’s a kind of external element that I wasn’t sure I wanted to include.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: