Skip navigation




    • Norman Hines
    • Posted May 8, 2009 at 10:00 am
    • Permalink

    Notice that it’s always the same bunch of leftists no matter what the subject of the demonstration. Limbaugh calls them the Rent-A-Mob.


    • Norman Hines
    • Posted May 8, 2009 at 10:32 am
    • Permalink

    That’s why the TEA parties are so amazing! The Silent Majority is silent because THEY HAVE TO BE AT WORK FROM 9 TO 5

  2. That’s the RASICTSEXISTBIGOTHOMOPHOBE shift, yes?

    • Norman Hines
    • Posted May 8, 2009 at 1:13 pm
    • Permalink

    Sorry; I can’t italicize in this text box.

    Thomophobe? I’m not afraid of Thomas Aquinas (even if I am Reformed Baptist [1689]).


  3. …but Limbaugh is the spawn of the devil, Norman, hadn’t you heard?

    And Dave that too is a spurious and hollow remark: of COURSE they’re employed: many are members in good standing with the well-respected United Acorn Workers Union.

    Definitely Norm, that’s a great point. Normal, wholesome folks are generally trying to hold down a respectable job and support their families much of the time; whereas the freaks and miscreants now comprising most of the Democrat Party are free to protest and demonstrate whole hog, since they hold those aforementioned priorities well below the goal of Changing America.

  4. And right again Dave with the correct term for that shift. Norman is of course funning with you, having not a shred of Thomophobia in him. He may however possess more than a trace of tofuphobia.

  5. *wibble*

  6. To be fair, libs have so many idiotic causes, it’s hard to keep them staright

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 9, 2009 at 7:23 am
    • Permalink

    Zack, your brilliance subtly reveals itself yet again!!

    Allison’s “error” in taking an “Elect Barney Frank” sign to a “Save the Whales” demonstration, seems perfectly logical to me!! In that instance, either sign could easily be interchanged with the other cause. Same point being made, no?

  7. “Straight” is an politically UM-correct term. Care to try again, thou bIGOTTE?

  8. Chuck: -and all of their manias and neurotic causes gaining force big time these last few months. It’s like a walk through a carnival funhouse minus the fun. BTW Dave just called you a bigotte for using the word “straight.”

    Glad you caught that one, Donna. And yes, any confusion over whales and Frank is completely understandable. Though I think I’d rather have an actual whale in congress than Barney Frank. Gay, hell– I’m still trying to figure out if he’s HUMAN.

    Dave: You’ve been spending time at Perez Hilton’s blog again, haven’t you? I can always tell.

  9. Thith is thoooo unfabulouth!!11!

  10. Pyonghwa: I only silence comments that are hysterical or reminiscent of a three-year old’s temper tantrum, in the interest of good taste. Hence you may remain, since yours is merely a comment with which I disagree. I’m glad you think I’m “entitled” to expressing my thoughts; the Democratic Party leadership, currently revving up toward a “Fairness Doctrine” or some related directive, are hell-bent on silencing the thoughts and opinions of many public opiners: demonstrating for all to see which side leans more closely toward fascism.

  11. Looks like someone has drunk the Kool-Aid and stumbled upon the graham cracker stash.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 7:39 am
    • Permalink

    Well, to be accurate Zack…Pyonghwa never said that he thought you were entitled to your constitutional right to free speech. He merely supposed. Translated: he and his kind are merely humoring the likes of you and “our kind”; know that that right can be revoked at less than a moment’s notice.

    Better start toeing the (party) line Zacky! (And know that if you do, I will hunt you down and whip you with some wet noodles…of the fair-trade tofu variety, of course. =oP)

  12. What’s wrong with drinking Kool-aid? It’s full of vitamin C and tasty fruit flavor, which is more than can be said about the liquor you guys drown yourself in as you fail to realize that you are quickly becoming more irrelevant in your own world.

  13. And besides, I’ve seen that Kool-aid line so much in political comments, blogs, everything. Guys, invent some new lingo! It’s not too hard!

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 10:43 am
    • Permalink

    BRAVO Zack!! You’re pissing the libs off…clearly evidenced by those like KAM coming here, posting commentary a three year old would be proud to claim. Excellent job!

    KAM…such intellectual wit and superior thought processes you are displaying. I look up to you in awe. No. Really. Just sitting here, taking a break from our home renovation, and contemplating your sapience, acumen and perspicacity that you are showering us with. How affable you are in your willingness to deign to visit Zack’s blog. I suspect that the execration you are most certainly experiencing is the driving factor behind your attempt at insult…which at most reveals itself to be nothing more than a nonsensical outburst. We’re all aware that your type suffers a predilection of trying to run with the big dogs, just as we’re all aware that you all seem to do no better than fail at such attempts. A bit of advice: do yourself…and your chosen party affiliation a favor…stay on the porch. Stupidity breeds fatuity, as your type proves time and again. Oh…and because I am magnanimous, I am including a link for Merriam Webster, as I suspect you will be in need of it.

    As for inventing to lingo…you first! Can we start with “Bush lied, people died”??! Cos we all know THAT one is fresh as a daisy.

  14. So what KOOL AID MALE is saying is that we should all just pack it in, pick up a fistful of rose petals, and get with The One’s Program.


    I feel light-headed already!

  15. Dave: Yes– they’re serving Kool-Aid at The Daily Kos and loads of other spots like that. You know the kind: “We’re envious of people who makes decent money through their own hard work and diligence, so we’ll elect other envious types to take the money of those who’ve accomplished something in life and spread it among us!” What a noble lot.

    Thanks for the translation of Pyongyhwa, Donna. And don’t worry– I don’t have it in me to tow the line. Plus with a threat like yours I wouldn’t dare. The thought of wet tofu noodles anywhere near me is enough to make me retch.

    Kool-aid Man: (Glad you’ve named yourself so aptly, by the way. Jim Jones, evidently an inspirational figure to you, was both a mass murderer and a communist. I like when folks warn us via their labels of where they’re coming from.) As for the liquor comment, would that be a slurring generalization, aka a bigoted remark, about conservatives you’re making? How very Liberal of you! As far as your weariness with the Kool-Aid line, if the moniker fits, wear it. Many hundreds of men, women and children died at the hands of Leftist “messiah” figure Jim Jones and I wouldn’t dream of dishonoring their memory by dumping the Kool-Aid metaphor. They deserve that posthumous honor.

  16. Thanks Donna, an admirable comment/English lesson. Too bad such deft word slinging isn’t enough to chase off the execrable miscreants who ruin nation after nation with the Leftism that history has proven a hundred times over is ever the road to death, destruction or human misery. Am I allowed to make it a requirement that liberals read Jonah Goldberg’s book “Liberal Fascism” before entering my blog?

    And yes Dave, you sound all primed to join the Borg, er, that is, the One. Trade in your car for a bicycle, toss a handful of rose petals over yourself, and sit lotus-positioned singing We Are The World and your membership card to Obamism will be winging its way to you.

  17. Paragraphs of back patting to compete with my two sentences? And the pissed off one is ME?

    Sounds like you guys could use some Black Cherry and some ice cubes. OH YEAH?

  18. And it was Flavor Aid they died with, not Kool-Aid. Whats the matter, Cons? Afraid to check the facts?


  19. Olook…a bamabot! Note the authentic link. Hey Hopeychangebot…send out regards to Dailykos & Chavez. Kiss kiss, bot!




  21. Define “compassion,” bamabot.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 4:36 pm
    • Permalink

    Let’s take it one step further, David…I suggest we require KAM not only define compassion, but provide proof of how liberals are oh so more compassionate than conservatives. If not, I vote the troll be ignored.

    So, there it is KAM: Define compassion, and prove that libs are more compassionate than cons. You DO understand the requirement, right? The onus is upon you.

  22. As a former lib, I can tell you how I defined “compassion” was I was a mushy-cranium’d ne’er-do-gooder.

    I defined compassion as the federal government punishing the rich and redistributing their assets to the poor. Of course, MY money wasn’t involved…after all, I was a member of the blessed and holy “in” crowd. So, to me…compassion was having VERY noble intentions with other people’s confiscated assets. After all, the only reason they’re rich in the first place is because they STOLE from the poor.

    Right, bamabot?

  23. hehehehe you said onus

  24. A term with which you’re no doubt intimately attached.

  25. Yeah, we shouldn’t let the federal government take from the poor, private enterprise tends to do that much better and in a much more soul-crushingly dreadful manner.

    I guess no corporation likes competition, HEH

    • Pyonghwa
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 4:52 pm
    • Permalink

    So what exactly is wrong with slicing a little small corner of the Rich’s vast cheese cube of wealth and using it to help people who need it most?

    I’d rather the rich be taxed to help provide food and facilitate the good of the population than have them spend that money on a banana hammock.

  26. Free Market’s invisible hand going for a reach around, if you will

  27. Did I nail it or what? No skin off the little red noses of the little red bamabots…just to feel good about wealth redistribution is good enough.

    Got Marx?

    • Pyonghwa
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 5:01 pm
    • Permalink

    Why was he evil again? Oh yeah cause of that whole Cold War thing. Wasn’t that eighteen years ago?

    So increasing taxes on the rich is Marxism? Wait, I thought government control of major economic and social institutions was.

    I don’t care if you’re rich, I’m happily middle class and so far the proletariat is pretty docile from my end, don’t worry about the class uprising anytime soon.

  28. REDISTRIBUTION of wealth is marxism, comrade. Got it?

    • Pyonghwa
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 5:04 pm
    • Permalink

    So then raising taxes isn’t Marzism after all, got it! Glad you clarified that for me because gosh darn that was confusing.

    I’ll let you know when the proletariat has taken up arms, so you can get to your gold plated armored Escalade safely.

  29. Hey comrade…not every kkkonservative is a rich white heterosexual christian male tapping his foot in airport bathrooms, trolling for webelos and meth.

    You came to this forum to troll, and so far, you and your bamabotbuddy are doing a great job. Time for you to report our “treasonous” thoughts to janet Renopolitano….after all, it’s WE who are the REAL terrorists.

    • Pyonghwa
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 5:12 pm
    • Permalink

    I like the use of Comrade by you all, used as a derogatory term to make me seem Russian, which would similarly make me a citizen of a country with a democratically elected government. Just like here. Huh. I’ll whip up a Venn Diagram for you.

    You’re the real terrorists? I thought the terrorists were the real terrorists. Silly me.

    In regards to your “treasonous” thoughts, weren’t liberal ideals just as “treasonous” during the bush administration?

    I respect your right to think the way you’d like, but a comic that portrays liberals as a mindless all-white mob is just as inaccurate as a comic portraying the republicans that way. Thus, the issue I have with this comic is how utterly false and somewhat ironic it is.

  30. Comrade infers your soviet “thought” process, comrade. Your condescending and patronizing attitude is flavor of the week, since the pendulum has swung about as far left as it can go. Funny thing is, you soviets think it’s stuck in that position.

    I assure you, according to The One, it is we kkkonservatives who are the REAL danger to the New Way of His Oneship (praise be the name of Maobamallah). Those Al queda folks are innocent victims of a rich white christian male hegemonic power hungry illuminati, steered by use of (hitherto unguided) weather phenomena to oppress the dark peoples.

    And…oh COMRADE…I don’t ever recall b√ľ$h alerting Homeland Security about Code Pink, or threatening to shut down MSNBC, or singling out any hollywood smellebrity for ridicule, derision, and death threats.

    I wonder, COMRADE, since you’re SO UPSET about the way Zack “maligns” you soviets, why you even bother to post anything…since the republican party is SO irrelevant, why not let them rot in peace instead of dancing on the grave?

    Got insecurity, COMRADE?

    • Pyonghwa
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 5:31 pm
    • Permalink

    I broadcasted insecurity? Welp, let me use a series of liberal terms mocking republican figureheads by referencing Halliburton every other word.

    Really, if you think that Obama is an Al Queda terrorist Muslim, go ahead, but I think the election proved you wrong.

    It’s funny, if you every met a Muslim you’d realize that they’re not so different from us. In fact, that’s the funny thing about politics; it’s basically trying to put as many walls between you and your opponent as possible.

    I tried to give you an olive branch, saying that it would be just as inaccurate to say a republican mob behaved in a way similar to the mob above, but you felt it prudent to ignore that. Then you spouted a vast field of jargon that is as unintelligible as it is illogical.

    Is it so wrong to disagree that one needs to make a vocabulary of derogatory mocking stereotype-ridden words to describe our president?

  31. Nice verbose DODGE there, comrade. Too bad Chrysler Corp is insolvent.

    Al Queda are THRILLED that The One is Emperor of Gaia. Why use suicide bombers when you can achieve the same ends via wealth redistribution while the mainstream media marvel at His every “umm” and “uhh?” George Soros, the mainstream media, hollywood and ACORN *bought* the last selection by the greatest and craftiest snowjob in the electronic age. I doubt they’ll repeat.

    Don’t go tryin’ to portray yourself as some reasonable moderate…you look silly enough. I’d be inclined to believe you if you could prove that you post similar protestations on the “Tom Tomorrow” blog, for example. After all, they’re REAL “progressives.” Nope…the only extremists are RIGHTIES.

    Guess that explains why you soviets view The One as a “centrist.” Hmm…”centrist.” If He (blessed be His Holy Name) is a “centrist,” who’s a “leftie?” Or do progressives not even think that such a creature exists? It’s either our way or Hitler, yes?

    As far as this olive branch is concerned, I’m sure your anal cavity is roomy enough to accommodate it, in that your head seems to fit perfectly therein.

    • Pyonghwa
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 5:47 pm
    • Permalink

    I’ll hit you up for a beer once we’re living in the same project working at the government controlled steel mill. ;D

    And stop getting creative with the terms and names for Obama, you’ll never get through college with that, unless it’s University of Phoenix. Even they might have a problem with that, damn liberals!

    • Pyonghwa
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 5:48 pm
    • Permalink

    Oh yeah.

    Ron Paulocaust 2012!

  32. It’s too late to apologize.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 6:06 pm
    • Permalink

    Well now, isn’t that typical of a lib?

    Stop waving the red herrings KAM, and PROVE that which you claimed: Libs are more compassionate than conservatives.

  33. *taps foot*

    *exploits the poor*

    *exhales poisonous carbon dioxide ON PURPOSE*

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 6:46 pm
    • Permalink

    Well, P…a few facts for you:

    At least at this precise moment in time, this IS still a free country. So, Zack can create, and depict, his liberal based cartoon in any way he chooses. So what if you don’t think it is an accurate depiction. Many of us regulars to Zack’s blog are former liberals. I admit that I was extremely hardcore. I think his depictions are dead on. But that is my opinion…agree with it, or not…I am still entitled to it. Zack is not searching you, nor your opinion, out. It is you whom have chosen to come here. If you don’t like what you see, then by all means, don’t let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya! (Hmmm…I probably should have replaced “Lord” with “0bama”, so you could relate a bit more to the adage.)

    Fact #2: How exactly did the election “prove David wrong” when it comes to whether or not 0bama is a muslim terrorist? The election did NOT prove anyone was, or was not, a terrorist. An election voting someone president does not negate one iota about the elected person. No more so than my simply stating I am the queen of England, makes me the queen. The only proofs that resulted from the election, were: a LOT of people have been seriously dumbed down; 0bama needs a teleprompter to speak, and even then, it is poorly done; and on a daily basis our rights are being stripped away by this administration. I admit that the groundwork was laid before him by Bush and Klinton…but history has shown that it is the current administration who takes the credit/blame for what occurs during their watch. And unfortunately, too many people in this administration aren’t watching the truly dangerous ones. I’ve yet to decide if that is intentional.

    I must say that I also find it comical that you attempt to call David out for his “derogatory” use of adjectives towards 0bama. You are being allowed to have your opinion…yet you would rob him of his?

    And you say Zack’s depictions are inaccurate. Oh, the irony.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 6:54 pm
    • Permalink

    And oh, btw P…how very “compassionate” of you to refer to a potential Ron Paul bid, in such a manner. “Ron Paulocaust 2012”. I suppose compassion is not required if you’re anti-semite, as you certainly seem to be representing yourself as. You might want to take KAM’s suggestion, and get some new “lingo”.

  34. I can has well pleased.

  35. *Bursts through wall carrying delicious vitamin C filled fruit drinks*

    OH YEAH!

  36. So his Ron Paulocaust comment isn’t a good thing to say in this world?

    I’m going to have a tough time telling my doctor I have Cerebral Ron Paulsy ūüė¶

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 8:46 pm
    • Permalink

    KAM…working on proving your claim, yet? What was it again? Ah yes: “liberals are more compassionate than conservatives”.

    Or, are you going to continue to ignore and deflect, in hopes that we’ll be sidetracked?

    You don’t mind if I DON’T hold my breath, waiting for you to “man” up, and provide proof of your claim…right?

  37. What claim do I have to prove? You’re simply too sternly convinced of your own ideas that any efforts by me to establish my own ideas of what it means to be compassionate will be shot down without consideration.

    I might as well be trying to teach a snake sign language. At least it would be an interesting linguistic experience.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 8:50 pm
    • Permalink

    The funny thing about your trying to be cute, KAM, is that I personally cannot stand Ron Paul. I think he is a fruit-loop. That liberal compassion you claim is certainly revealing itself. Oh, silly me. I forgot that compassion is also not required on the part of liberals, when it comes to those you feel are undeserving of life, especially those whom you deem are not living a “quality” life.

    Now…stop deflecting, and trying to change the subject. Prove your claim.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 8:54 pm
    • Permalink

    What claim do you have to prove? Only the one you pronounced: “Liberals are more compassionate than conservatives”. Prove it.

    And BTW, we’re not addressing the issue of your “efforts to establish YOUR OWN IDEAS OF WHAT IT MEANS TO BE COMPASSIONATE“. That is an entirely different issue altogether. YOU, and you alone, made a claim that liberals were more compassionate than conservatives. PROVE IT.

  38. But deflecting is fun!

    And I don’t consider myself compassionate. Just passionate, and I think your resistance is kicking up something in my heart.

  39. And why do I need to prove my claim? Can’t I take the Neocon route and just chalk it up to God’s doing?

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 10, 2009 at 8:59 pm
    • Permalink

    I’m almost disappointed. You gave up so easily. Not that I expected less.

  40. Ah ha ha, they are in worse shape than I thought. Pyonghwa and Kool-Aid man,just one simple question for you both, please. Who are you defending here? Obama or Yourselves?

    • Norman Hines
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 7:57 am
    • Permalink

    Charity is superior to welfare. In the latter, the goverment takes money by force from the productive and gives it to the unproductive. The taxpayers thus resent both the government that taxes and the poor (and others) that benefits, while the recipients feel entitled to the largess. Also, the government is insanely inefficient, for every dollar taxed for welfare, or 25 cents actually get to the intended recipients.

    In the former, the giver gives out of the goodness of his heart and feels good; resenting neither the charity (religious or not) nor the poor who receive. The recipients, on the other hand feel not entitlement but gratitude. Also, charities can be very efficient, since many who do work for them volunteer.

    Which one, Oh Compassionate Kool-Aid Man, is more compassionate?

  41. Kool-aid Mad, er, that is, Man: I’m happy to have you here and your input has been enlightening in a certain sense. But I gotta say your persistent, hours-long refusal to follow through on Donna’s simple request that you back up your spurious claim of greater compassion on the liberal side, speaks volumes about the hollowness of your declaration. By the way quite the opposite is the truth: red states give more to charity than blue states across the board, from the poor to the wealthy. This is a fact, not a “right wing rumor” or wishful thinking on my part. Please, for the sake of future fun arguments here and elsewhere, try checking the facts on issues on which you wish to opine– it makes for vastly more profound and more useful discourse. While you’re checking those facts, I’d also suggest you find and read Jonah Goldberg’s “Liberal Fascism” so that you’ll be further equipped with reality rather than just cute quips and tropes that really don’t help “progress the cause of humankind,” surely a goal you’d want to advance.

  42. Donna: You’ve been superb. No, not because I agree with your many fine points but because of your clarity and precision throughout this ordeal– er, that is, argument. Interesting to hear of your previous philosophical bent, and I admit I too once voted for Democrats before serious reading and thinking entered my life. Why will the passion that so drives commentators like Pyonghwa and Kool-aid Man not drive them to read the many easily available books that, through footnotes and point-by-point logic, totally demolish the fantasy-structure of modern Liberalism? Anyway– great to have you around!

  43. Dave: We all know your fun and irreverent side, but it was great seeing the seriously well-grounded arguments you made throughout this long exchange. Nice, getting Kool-aid to admit to his desire to see those who accomplish things stolen from by a bullying, confiscatory government so that those whom Kool-aid deigns worthy may have more cash. Why those who build and create (at the cost of untold sacrifice and toil, most often) are less worthy of keeping their earnings than those who do not, will remain one of the great Marxist Mysteries, I guess– no less mysterious (and infinitely more virulent) than the mysteries of, say, the various great religions of the world.

  44. Pyonghwa: Great having your copious input here, albeit we don’t agree on much. So many point have been made that I don’t have the time to address them all, and besides Donna and Dave spoke many of the rebutting arguments I might have offered. But I do need to ask you: do you mean to suggest that my cartoons and/or worldview is to be slurred as implicitly “racist” because my group of seven gay protestors happens in this case to be all White? Should I have made it one quarter White, one quarter Black, one quarter Latino and one quarter Asian?? This seems to be the direction your philosphical bent would point to; do you not understand the kind of creative straitjacket to which you’d like the world to conform? Should all TV commercials, all books, all movies, all rock groups be similarly divied up along the lines of this robotic liberal fantasy-vision?

  45. There is already a trend in TV ads to dummify white males. They are teh evil.

  46. Norman: Brilliantly clear and precise– thanks for this. I’ll sit here waiting eagerly for both Kool-aid and Ponghwa’s rebuttals. Please guys, we like your input but TRY to address precisely the points stated here by Norman and not to digress into secondary issues. These are excellent specific jumping off points: why not address them?

    • Ikabod
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 10:47 am
    • Permalink

    Now I can realize that being poor sucks. (or does the “poor sucks” comment not understanding enough) I have been there, I have done with unemployment gotten out of the situation. Yet I never saw unemployment as an end all to my plight. I got a job, (yes even in this economy). I did not blame the economy nor the President, past or present that I didn‚Äôt have a job nor did I expect the President past or present to just give me one just because I was breathing. To claim that we as conservatives are un-compassionate or that the rich could use their money for the so-called greater good of society is a non-issue. One, the rich usually are the ones owning large corporations that happen to employee hundreds if not thousands of people. Sorry if the jobs maybe the mail room or a fry cook at the local fast food joint. The fact is they are employed. A saying from a person obviously from the bourgeois ‚Äúsocialism works great until you run out of other people’s money‚ÄĚ.

    As for this president. I can remember within a year of his inauguration, the compassionate left was all about mean spirited politics and class warfare. ‚ÄúNot my president‚ÄĚ was a very popular bumper sticker. Which now have been carefully removed from VW micro vans. I‚Äôm sure that my right to leaving my car from being keyed will be realized if I place that bumper sticker on my vehicle now.

    I will happy await your response while sitting on my banana hammock.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 10:50 am
    • Permalink

    How correct you are, David. As much as it may be denied, there has been a huge liberal push in this country, especially since the 60’s, to make white males irrelevant. I used to take such pride in metaphorically castrating men, when I was a lib. I cannot begin to convey to you the shame I feel upon reflection. I will tell you that I have regrets that I cannot begin to describe, especially as I am now feeling the effects of that which I took such great pride in before. I married a blond haired, blue eyed man…and my 8 year old son? He too is blond haired and blue eyed. I pray for his future many times a day…and fear what may come to pass, if libs have their way.

  47. ‚Äúsocialism works great until you run out of other people‚Äôs money‚ÄĚ

    ^ I’m having that tattooed on the inside of my eyelids

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 11:03 am
    • Permalink


  48. Tell me about it. I have a solar powered tattoo anvil.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 11:13 am
    • Permalink

    Can I make one small suggestion? If you’re tattooing the inside of your eyelids yourself, just remember the reflection in the mirror is backwards. =oP

  49. NOW you tell me

    *erases previous work with eco-friendly burp laser*

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 11:30 am
    • Permalink

    How many carbon credits does that burp laser cost ya? *Zoinks*

  50. 32% less than that overstressed 2nd button of algore’s armani muumuu.

    • Ikabod
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 12:39 pm
    • Permalink

    Carbon Credits!? Now there’s a sweet un-regulated industry!

  51. so many protests
    only so much one can do
    the issues all blur

  52. Are they gone?

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 7:05 pm
    • Permalink

    I would imagine so. Demand proof and facts, and libs tend to tuck and run.

  53. Donna, Dave: Yes– off to soap someone else’s windows, to drape TP over someone else’s trees and spraypaint their walls with angry vapid cliches. For now, the children have gone.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 7:09 pm
    • Permalink

    Odd. Where’d my last comment go?

  54. I sold it to the Belgian Navy.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 7:43 pm
    • Permalink

    LMBO!!! No doubt it wouldn’t be the French military! ūüėõ

  55. Donna, the last one I got copied in my email ended with “…libs tend to tuck and run.” Did you write one since then? If you did, so sorry– I have no record of it. Could the children have abscondd with it somehow?

  56. Donna: the french navy is almost completely free of smurfs ‘n waffles.

  57. Ikabod: One of the key things worth despising the Left for is their tendency to deprive the poor. Not of money; they are all for giving the poor other people’s money (very often the money of those who were once poor but worked hard to change that). No– what the Left deprives the poor of is the spiritual concept of INITIATIVE. Whenever you toss someone a handout– someone, that is, who is capable of earning a piece of bread for himself if he will but raise the initiative to do so– you deprive them of another shot at self-actualization. In their zeal to pat themselves on the back for conniving to get other people’s money in order to patronize, like some hapless pet, society’s poor, the Left helps deprive those poor of the chance to rise out of poverty by seeking in themselves the solutions to their poverty.

  58. The theft of dignity…hence the soft bigotry of low expectations.

    That’s why I will NOT be lectured to by a self-wrongeous (I patented that term) smarmy neochom being all noble advocating the “spreading around” of legally earned fruits of an entrepreneur’s labor.

  59. Was it a joke about your last comment being missing, Donna? Like maybe it was snatched by the Lefties? You were way ahead of me. (It’s been along day.)

    Dave: Glad you erased the eyelid tatoo. Much easier to carry a portable teleprompter around with you.

    Vegas: Good point– Left seems to mean Never Having to Say You’re Not Angry. SO many things to march around about. Must be tough to always need to Fix The World instead of maybe concentrating more on making your own life exemplary and earning a decent living so you can give to charity yourself instead of bullying others into it….etc. etc.

  60. Jose– I think you got their number big time. Right about when you made your point, they were outa here.

  61. Dave: “Self-wrongeous” is delightful, and “neochom” is brilliant. And good for you, sticking to your ground. To paraphrase Churchill: never, never, never, never give in to delusional lefties.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 10:40 pm
    • Permalink

    Nope. Not a joke about the lost comment. When I tried to repost it, it wouldn’t allow me, saying something along the lines of “Oops, our wordpress records show you have already posted that comment”…that’s not verbatim, but the gist of what it said.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 10:44 pm
    • Permalink

    See…another comment just bit the dust.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 11, 2009 at 10:46 pm
    • Permalink

    Basically, what the comment said, was that I fully suspected one of the two to come back, declaring that they weren’t cutting and running, nor were they going to be run off…and that we might see a post or two more from them, before they disappeared into insignificant obscurity on the world wide web.

    (And that is one long, run-on sentence I just posted! =oP)

    • Ikabod
    • Posted May 12, 2009 at 9:47 am
    • Permalink

    I’m surprised that they have not tried to shut this site down. I mean how else are the going to squelch debate, free speech, and free thought.

  62. Give it time. Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, political dissidents…

  63. Thanks for the summary, Donna, and the champion run-on sentence. You’re probably right: they’ll be back. But it’s nice to know that as long as one is armed with simple logic and the facts, their shrill denunciations are no more challenging than a 2nd grader stomping his feet in rage because someone took his favorite crayon.

    Ikabod: They have in mind initially squelching freedom of speech on the radio before taking on the internet. First things first!

  64. #100

    Do I win a bean pie?

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 12, 2009 at 9:10 pm
    • Permalink

    Nope. You win the wet tofu-based noodles that I threatened to whip Zack with. Cannot guarantee their condition upon arrival on your doorstep. =oP

  65. Chewed, most likely.

  66. Donna: Thanks for the suggestion– now I don’t have to come up with a prize for Dave myself. P.S. Friends have actually emailed congratulating me on this long exchange and citing your brilliance in particular. (Dave, you mostly puzzle them.) (Still– congratulations, and don’t worry: while rummaging around here I found you something really good so you don’t have to prepare for receiving Donna’s crappy prize. I have several not too aged bottles of predigested wheat grass I’d be happy to send you by way of reward for Comment #100.)

  67. Predigested by WHOM? It matters, ya know.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 13, 2009 at 9:26 am
    • Permalink


    Well, let your friends know that while I am extremely flattered, the only real thing learned about me is WHOOO-DOGGIES can she be long-winded!! Lucky thing for the world the long-windedness isn’t from the methane producing end! =oP

  68. Wanna see long-winded? Search “amazing atheist” on YewToob.

    • Donna C
    • Posted May 13, 2009 at 9:36 am
    • Permalink


    You are clearly not properly walking in lockstep yet. If you were, you’d have surely known that the predigested wheat grass could come from no one other that the Big 0…BarryBoy himself. Hie thee hence to thy nearest re-education camp. Be on the lookout for those free-trade tofu noodles I offered. Do with them as you will; I highly suspect they will be a hot commodity amongst your handlers at said camp.

    Code words are “hope & change”, should you decide you want us to break you out.

  69. Which is the username & which is the pass?

  70. No, Donna– that other type of long-windedness is more the province of wheat grass habituees.

    Dave, thanks for that hot tip and unfortunately I’m sure you’re 100% correct. I’ll put that search on my to-do list– at around number 23,719.

  71. Actually, YewtOOB has such a hard-on for AA and YoungTurks that you needn’t search…they’ll come to YOU in “featured” videos.

    ….and FOX News is biased.

  72. Dave: Oh glory, I can hardly wait for the uninvited ones to arrive. Maybe “Pewtube” is more to the point.

  73. So, what flavor should I supply you guys with today?

    Limeonade? Orange? Blue-raspberry? Fruit Punch?

    Or how about a lil sip of my hopejuice

  74. Does Maobamallah make you wipe off before sticking it in your pooper?

  75. IN MAH BUTT?


    • TUM
    • Posted August 6, 2009 at 4:34 pm
    • Permalink

    Yeah so I’m a little confused by the “I’M GAY SO YOU SHOULD BE TOO” sign. Care to explain, Zack?

  76. TUM: It’s a joke of a sign; this being a cartoon, such humor is liable to crop up. It would be like, if I did a cartoon of a heterosexual trucker redneck type (and I have done every kind of cartoon over the years), I might have him at some imaginary protest holding a sign that says, “Beer is God.” All people have foibles and excesses, and no group should be above satirizing, including gay-rights advocates.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: