Skip navigation

Category Archives: Progressives

Don’t forget to check out the Diversity Lane website!  Get the background scoop on these miserable characters and their anti-American free-for-all of a household.  While there, purchase Diversity Lane/ A Liberal Family Saga, the oversized  blockbuster of a book that’s sending leftists everywhere over the edge like lemmings.

On the Epic Leftist Hatred of Palin
 
Hating Palin’s quite the craze,
Because she is a broad;
Lefty-feminists defend the gals?
We’ve learned they ply a fraud
That says “defense of women”
Is what they’re all about,
As they lash into this female foe,
Each an angry Leftist lout.
 
Hating Palin’s quite the rage,
Because she speaks her mind,
As Leftist big mouths all shout out,
“Free speech must be confined
To only those anointed
By the Leftists’ thought patrol,
For we are duly appointed
To administer speech control.”
 
Hating Palin’s a disarmed crusade,
For her hunting with a gun,
Because all those nice Leftists
Find this abhorrent fun,
As they dine on fleshy meat
That’s wrapped in plastic clean.
They think their meat’s not slaughtered,
For that would just be mean.
 
Hating Palin’s a civil right,
Because she gives the lie
To women not worth dating
Who then do loud decry
She’s simply far too fetching,
And this is not quite right.
There are homely Leftists retching
Before her pretty sight.
 
Hating Palin’s necessary
For at least a year or two,
Lest she become a candidate
Who’d expose the political view
That Leftists with No Labels
Want to tuck away,
As if they’d hide in closets
Until they gain their sway.
 
Hating Palin’s easy to do,
When civil Leftists love,
Because it’s just a love tap
Transformed into a shove
Which hopes to topple Sarah
From headlines and from quotes
Which tell of Leftists’ failures
And makes them lose more votes.
 
Hating Palin’s an activist’s dream.
Silence her, for free speech’s sake!
She stands when they shout her down,
And hate her for civility’s stake
Demanding we sing in harmony
To the Leftists’ jack boot tunes,
Which march in dark formation
With hatred urging on their goons.
 
Hating Palin’s most sincere,
For Leftists boil with rage
To see their debt-filled visions
Dance upon their stage.
Palin hold no office now,
And this is quite unfair,
For failures by the Democrats
Have quite become their snare.
 
Silence her and others,
Lest they loud reveal the truth
That old Liberality’s bankrupt
And plans to bill the youth
For all they’ve wasted in their day
Which adds to mammoth debt,
They’d pass on to generations
As a clear and present threat.
 
Hating Palin’s critical,
Erecting smoke and mirrors,
Because the truth is coming
Which even the Leftist fears.
The Ponzi schemes are wobbling,
The plans are gone awry,
And the best the Left can offer
Is to blame the other guy.
 
The other guy’s a woman,
This time ’round the voting bloc,
And hating Palin’s all they’ve got
To preach to their Lefty flock.
Look beneath Palin’s skirt:
You find a woman there.
But look beneath the Leftists’ hem,
There’s No Label they can bear.
 
    — Siegmund Wagneryann

Jamie Glazov’s new show has an astounding line-up of interviews scheduled (Robert Spencer, Stanley Kurtz, etc.) including some of the foremost experts on Islamoterrorism in the world today.  Here’s the premiere installment, with part two already available at Frontpage Magazine.  Phillippe Karsenty has courageously exposed a notorious hoax perpetrated by virulent antisemitic participants (and bought into by the ever anti-Israel left, as usual).  Must-viewing for fans of Courage.

Dr. Jamie Glazov of Frontpage Magazine has just published what Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney calls “the most important book in America.”  After reading the full review by Richard Perle at Frontpage it hardly sounds like an overstatement.  From Perle’s review:

“In this extraordinary collection of interviews, Jamie Glazov demonstrates that consistent, searching questions can both enrich and impart coherence to disparate answers: for what emerges from 29 interviews conducted over eight years is an illuminating  and important commentary on the largest issues facing America and the West.

It is a commentary whose preoccupation reflects history—Jamie’s Glazov’s history, rich in the issues of identity, freedom, truth telling and courage.  Jamie, it may be said, has had rather more history than he needed—as a man whose parents were dissidents in the Soviet Union and who was taught the values of freedom and the courage to fight for it from the beginning.  It is no wonder that he is so wholly absorbed in understanding and opposing, radical, political Islam and its apologists.  Today’s “useful idiots,” like those who preceded them, are drawn almost entirely from the Left.  Indeed, many of the individuals are the same, as is the intellectual foundation of their obsessive disdain for the liberal values of an open society.  In one way or another nearly all the interviews in this book touch on the readiness of the Left, in an often ludicrous pursuit of political correctness, to accept, and even to advance, the Islamist agenda that has replaced communism as the principal threat to western values and civilization…”

[Actual letter to leftist talk radio host Bill Press]

Dear Mr. Bill Press,

Today while I was scanning through channels on my new XM radio I came across your program on XM’s American Left Channel. You were discussing President Obama and Mexico’s President Felipe Calderon’s comments on Arizona’s law to enforce a pre-existing Federal Law. Your comments were how terrible this law was and that you were on the side of President Obama, President Calderon, and millions of illegal immigrants who are in this country now or seek to violate our laws by crossing our border improperly in the future. While I am certain that I am not your typical listener, being that there was no tinfoil on my head while I was listening to protect from my brain wave patterns from being read, I decided to call in to your show anyway.

Your phone screener who took my call and asked for my question seemed very friendly until I told him what I was calling about. My question was “Which part of the Arizona law, specifically, were you in fear would violate the Civil Rights of American Citizens who were not in violation of any law or engaging in suspicious activity which would cause Law Enforcement Professionals to stop the individual?” and “Have you read the ten (10) page law?” Your call screener informed me that you did not have time to take my question.

I must have lost signal while in discussion with your call screener and had to call back due to no longer being connected when I was asking why you would not take my call. I was immediately able to get through to the same screener again, which tells me that I was the only caller, and asked him why you would not take my the question.

He put me on hold for a minute then came back and said that you did not want to take the question. This can only lead me to believe that, much like Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, President Obama, and everyone else on the President’s staff, you have not read the law of which you are not in favor. So, I am asking you now, are you not in favor or Arizona’s right as a state to empower its law enforcement professionals to enforce federal laws, or are you not in favor of the federal laws themselves? Would you actually prefer that people could come across our borders without any documentation, process, or paperwork? Do you support Illegal Immigration or do you think that people who break the law should have to face punishment for the laws that were broken?

If your car were struck by an illegal immigrant and you were told by your insurance company that you were responsible for the damages because the person who was actually at fault was not a U.S. citizen and therefore did not have insurance, driver’s license or valid address, may I suppose that you would not mind that the individual wouldn’t be held accountable for their actions and wouldn’t be sent back to their country of origin?

Mexico has much harsher Illegal Immigration laws than we do. For first offence the penalty is two years in prison. The second is about ten years. Do you favor Mexico’s Immigration laws? Are you in favor of the harsh penalty that is imposed? Do you support the rights of the Mexican Government to enforce laws within their own country? If you support the rights of the Mexican Government, why do you not support the right of a state to make laws that strengthen U.S. laws?

I understand that this was not a fair discussion. I brought intelligence along with a well thought-out argument. I’m citing actual facts and actually HAVE read the bill. I had hoped that even though you were unarmed in a battle of wits you would still find time to debate me on the air. Maybe others can call your show at 866-557-7377 and have more luck than I did about asking if you have read the ten page bill or not.

Perhaps it was an unfair question. I understand that to keep your job of Left Wing Radio Host you have to at least appear to be of the same intelligence as your listeners. Possibly it was the phrasing of the question that made it difficult to answer. Instead of Illegal Immigrant, maybe I should have used the phrase “Undocumented Democrat Voter”. Perhaps then you might have been able to answer. Perhaps one day we might stop being racist and unjust as a nation and stop the illegal practice of writing our laws in English, which not all of our residents understand. Or maybe we can commission all those artists, encouraged by Nancy Pelosi to quit their jobs and pursue their passion, to rewrite the laws of the U.S. in picture pages so everyone can understand them.

Jason Sanborn

From the soon to be former State of Texas

as posted on 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 60 other followers